1. G. Zipf, “Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology,” Linguistic Society of America, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 394-401, 1949.
  2. A. I. Saichev, Y. Malevergne, and D. sornette, “Theory of Zipf's Law and Beyond,” Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
  3. S. Huang, D. Yen, L. Yang, and S. Hua, “An investigation of Zipf’s Law for fraud detection,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 70-83, 2008.
  4. M. Jauhari, A. Saxena, and J. Gautom, “Zipf’s Law and Number of hits on the World Wide Web,” Annals of Library and Information Studies, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 81-84, 2007.
  5. L. Adamic and B. Huberman, “Zipf’s Law and the Internet,” Glottometrics 3, pp. 143-150, 2002.
  6. B. R. Chang and H. F. Tsai, “Improving network traffic analysis by foreseeing datapacket- flow with hybrid fuzzy-based model prediction,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 6960-6965, 2009.
  7. J. Sommers and P. Barford, “Self-Configuring Network Traffic Generation,” in Proceedings of ACM Internet Measurement Conference, Italy, pp. 68-81, 2004.
  8. S. Guadagno, D. Emma, A. Pescap and N. Federico, “D-ITG Distributed Internet Traffic Generator,” in Proceedings, First International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, Netherlands, pp. 316-317, 2004.
  9. “tcpreplay-Tcpreplay,” [Online].Available: http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/wiki/tcpreplay, 2015.
  10. “Network, devices & services testing - Spirent,” [Online]. Available: http://www.spirent.com/. [Accessed 24- 07-2015].
  11. W. M. Shbair, A. R. Bashandy, and S. I. Shaheen, “A New Security Mechanism to Perform Traffic,” in International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, pp. 405-411, 2009.
  12. F. Sally and P. Vern, “Difficulties in simulating the internet,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 392-403, 2001.
  13. V. Paxson, “Strategies for sound internet measurement,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 264-271, 2004.
  14. V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, “Anomaly detection: a survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1-58, 2009.
  15. S. Luo and G. A. Marin, “Generating Realistic Network Traffic for Security Experiments,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Southeast Conf., North Carolina, USA, pp. 200-207, 2004.
  16. E. Garsva, N. Paulauskas, G. Grazulevicius, and L. Gulbinovic, “Packet Inter-arrival Time Distribution in Academic Computer Network,” Elektronika IR Elektrotechnika, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 87-90, 2014.
  17. M. Fras, J. Mohorko, and Z. Cucej, “Packet Size Process Modeling of Measured Self-similar Network Traffic with Defragmentation Method,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, Bratislava, pp. 253-256, 2008.
  18. W. E. Leland, M. S. Taqqu, W. Willinger, and D. V. Wilson, “the Self-Similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic (extended version),” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 1994.
  19. M. A. Arfeen, K. Pawlikowski, D. McNickle, and A. Willig, “The Role of the Weibull Distribution in Internet Traffic Modeling,” in 25th International Conference Teletraffic Congress (ITC), Shanghai, pp. 1-8, 2013.
  20. L. R. Dominguez, D. O. Roman, D. M. Rodriguez, and C. V. Rosales, “Jitter in IP Networks: A Cauchy Approach,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 190-192, 2010.
  21. T. K. Bandhopadhya, M. Saxena, and A. Tiwari, “Jitter’s Alpha Stable Distribution Behavior,” Computer Technology and Electronics Engineering (IJCTEE), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13-16, 2013.
  22. “MAWI Working Group Traffic Archive,” [Online]. Available: http://mawi.wide.ad.jp/mawi/. [Accessed 24-07- 2015].