The Design Process Reform of the Gama-ray Imaging System by using the Design Structure Matrix

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

This study investigates improving the process of design and interaction analysis of Gama-ray imaging systems. Gama-ray imaging systems have many applications in medical sciences, military and security organizations and for each application area, different parameters have gained attention in the product design process. The complexity of the product design process and variety of design parameters confirm the need for development of a comprehensive map for product design which demonstrates subsystem interactions and the way that each parameters effects other parameters. Hence the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) is used to display and analyze the interaction of design influencing parameters. DSM offers network modeling tools that represent the elements of a system and their interactions, thereby highlighting the system's designed structure. Its advantages include compact format, visual nature, intuitive representation, powerful          analytical capacity, and flexibility. In this research we have proposed a DSM which consists of 49          parameters for the mentioned product and then this matrix has been analyzed and clustered by using the related software. As a result, the parameters have been divided into five design cycles after prioritization. The system designer can identify the parameters' effect and trace the systematic design process by using this matrix.
 

Keywords


 
[1]     S. D. Eppinger and T. R. Browning, “Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications,” MIT Press, 2012.
[2]     Y. Ali, “An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method,” Urbana, vol. 51, pp. 1-17, 2004.
[3]     T. R. Browning, “Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration problems: A Review and New Directions,” Ieee T Eng Manage, vol. 48, pp.     292-306, 2001.
[4]     C. Zattoni, “Analysis of Airport Check-in Operation and Its Reconfigurable Design and Management,” Doctoral Theses, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Politecnico Dimilano, Milan, 2011.
[5]     D. Tang, G. Zhang, and S. Dai, “Design as Integration of Axiomatic Design and Design Structure Matrix,” Robot Cim-Int Manuf, vol. 25, pp. 610-619, 2009.
[6]     M. Danilovic and T. R. Browning, “Managing Complex Product Development Projects with Design Structure Matrices and Domain Mapping Matrices,” INT J. Proj. Manag., vol. 25, pp. 300-314, 2007.
[7]     A. Yassine and D. Braha, “Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method,” Concurrent Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 165-176, 2003.
[8]     M. S. Avnet and A. L. Weigel, “An Application of the Design Structure Matrix to Integrated Concurrent Engineering,” Acta Astronaut, vol. 66, pp. 937-949, 2010.
[9]     D. A. Batallas and A. A. Yassine, “Information Leaders in Product Development Organizational Networks: Social Network Analysis of the Design Structure Matrix,” IEEE T Eng Manage, vol. 53, pp. 570-582, 2006.
 
[10]  X. Deng, G. Huet, S. Tan, and C. Fortin, “Product Decomposition Using Design Structure Matrix for Intellectual Property Protection in Supply Chain Outsourcing,” Comput. Ind., vol. 63, pp. 632-641, 2012.
[11]  H. Robert, Y. Ali, and M. Christoph,               “Systematic Module and Interface Definition Using Component Design Sructure Matrix,” J. Eng. Design, vol. 21, pp. 647-675, 2010.
[12]  M. mohammadi and M. karbasian, “Clustering the Product Design Structure Matrix Using an Innovative Algorithm,” Eighth. Int. Conf. Ir Oper. Res., 2015. (In Persian)
[13]  A. kosari, M. fakoor, sh. Vakili poor, and V. boloori, “Systematic Design of a Cubic Satellite Using the Design Structure Matrix Method,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, pp. 35-45, 2015. (In Persian)
Volume 6, Issue 3 - Serial Number 23
November 2018
Pages 95-106
  • Receive Date: 10 January 2018
  • Revise Date: 09 May 2018
  • Accept Date: 27 May 2018
  • Publish Date: 22 November 2018